Q1. Do you agree with our proposal that social care workers who don’t hold the recognised qualifications but do have sufficient managerial experience and are enrolled to complete the level 4 and level 5 qualification within three years of registering, can register to be a social care manager?
You responded:
Yes: 77 per cent
No: 23 per cent
You said that the proposal would benefit attracting new managers and will enable opportunities for mangers to move from other regulated settings.
Q2. Do you agree with our proposal that social care workers who were required to complete the level 2 or 3 qualification listed in the qualification framework within the first three-year period of registration, will now have up to six years (over two three-year periods of registration), to complete the qualification?
You responded:
Yes: 68 per cent
No: 32 per cent
Most of you told us that allowing more time to complete the qualifications was a good idea and this change will have a positive impact on well-being.
Q3. Do you agree with our proposal for special school residential workers to register using the qualifications listed?
You responded:
Yes: 89 per cent
No: 11 per cent
Q4. Do you agree with our proposal for special school residential workers who don’t hold one of the recognised qualifications to register using the employer assessment route?
You responded:
Yes: 89 per cent
No: 11 per cent
Q5. Do you think the standards and expectations for workers set out in the residential childcare practice guidance are reasonable and achievable?
You responded:
Yes: 91 per cent
No: 9 per cent
Q6. Do you agree with the proposal for special school residential managers to register using the qualifications listed?
You responded:
Yes: 91 per cent
No: 9 per cent
Q7. Do you agree with our proposal for special school residential workers who don’t hold one of the recognised qualifications to register using the other registration routes?
You responded:
Yes: 81 per cent
No: 19 per cent
Q8. Do you think the standards and expectations for managers set out in the practice guidance are reasonable and achievable?
You responded:
Yes: 93 per cent
No: 7 per cent
Q9. What effects will our proposals have on the Welsh language, specifically on:
- opportunities for people to use Welsh
- treating the Welsh language no less favourably than the English language.
How could we increase the positive effects or reduce the negative ones?
You said:
“Hopefully there will be more awareness of the importance of the Welsh language and maybe encourage people who live and work in Wales who do not speak Welsh to have the confidence to try and learn the Welsh language, even if it is just a few words or phrases.”
“There should be no negative impact on the use of Welsh language and a more positive effect should be observed as the Active offer is a natural part of the delivery of qualifications in Wales.”
Several people suggested it would be helpful to have access to Welsh language resources that staff could use.
Q10. Do the standards have an impact on those with protected characteristics? The protected characteristics are age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation.
You said:
“I feel that the proposals will accommodate those with protected characteristics - in particular, age, disability, and pregnancy and maternity as these can affect how an individual progresses with their qualification. This is because they may need extra support to complete their qualification so it may take them longer.”
“What would benefit people with learning difficulties/low levels of literacy who work in the sector is to introduce an accepted Level 1 qualification that would allow them to register to continue to work in the sector and achieve a realistic qualification. Lots of workers have a lot to offer the workforce but are put off by the demands of having to achieve a qualification, especially workers who have been in the sector and out of education for many years.”
There were a high number of responses that suggested allowing six years to complete the qualification would have a positive effect on those with protected characteristics.