We’ve collected the most frequently asked questions about the national safeguarding training, learning and development standards on this page.
We’ll update this page regularly with any other questions we get.
We’ve collected the most frequently asked questions about the national safeguarding training, learning and development standards on this page.
We’ll update this page regularly with any other questions we get.
Having these standards:
You can use the standards to plan and inform learning and development opportunities and to support multi-disciplinary learning.
Education institutes, such as universities, further education colleges and schools, can use the standards to provide a clear structure to safeguarding learning and development.
All organisations (public services, third and independent sector) can also use them to produce reports about safeguarding practice and performance.
The purpose of these standards is to make sure everyone in Wales gets consistent and good quality safeguarding learning and development. Because this learning and development is relevant to their role and responsibilities, they’ll be able to safeguard people to the best of their ability. This will also give assurance to the Regional Safeguarding Boards.
The standards will help organisations make sure:
The development group chose the term ‘groups’ to sort practitioners by their roles and responsibilities. This means organisations and practitioners can use the standards flexibly because for some roles, practitioners will need to have the knowledge and skills from a different group.
The ‘groups’ in the standards match the ‘levels’ set out in NHS Roles and Competencies for Healthcare Staff. For example, Group A is the same as Level 1.
The standards make sure the design, content and provision of safeguarding training, learning and development across Wales is consistent.
The standards clearly set out what appropriate content for safeguarding training, learning and development for practitioners in Wales should look like.
Where possible, training, learning and development should be multi-agency. This will help develop awareness of each practitioner’s role in early intervention and prevention work and in the safeguarding process.
The language used was a challenge. Our discussions focused on ‘levels’ versus ‘groups’, with ‘levels’ guided by what was used in the health sector.
Equal voices and opportunities were seen as a challenge to begin with, but they were crucial to developing the standards. All the organisations involved had to understand and respect each other’s needs and this shared empathy benefited the standards’ development. It was also important everyone understood the voluntary sector’s role in the safeguarding process.
By having discussions, working together and understanding each other’s needs, the development group was able to see each other’s points of view and think about what the standards and framework meant for each organisation and sector. This allowed us to create common safeguarding learning and development standards and a training, learning and development framework.
Everyone involved now feels the standards and framework are relevant to their organisation and sector – they speak and belong to all. This is the real achievement!
The challenge will be who will develop the training, learning and development that must follow the standards and framework, and who will provide that training. Paying for it will also be a challenge. Training, learning and development needs investment and staff will need time off to attend and/or provide the training.
Putting timescales around the development and implementation of the standards and framework is also challenging, to make sure every organisation , practitioner and volunteer reach similar milestones at the same time. The standards and framework will need buy-in from everyone, and for everyone to feel they apply to them.
Other challenges include the perceived fear of safeguarding, and “Is this my responsibility?” “Does this have my name on it?” The standards place responsibility on certain practitioners to understand and apply safeguarding procedures when this may not have been something they expected to do.
Every area of the social and health care sector was involved in the development of the standards, so organisations are expected to voluntarily comply with them.
The Regional Safeguarding Boards own the standards and framework, and this places a clear expectation on all organisations to comply with the standards.
All statutory partners and other related organisations will be expected to apply the standards and the framework when carrying out their roles.
Every Regional Safeguarding Board was involved in developing the standards. The regional safeguarding board partners own the standards and framework.
They will:
The Safeguarding Standards Review Group will be set up in early 2023. It will monitor and review how the standards are put into practice. The group will include some members of the development group, as well as new members.
The standards will be reviewed every three months after their launch – in April, July and October 2023 and in January 2024.
It will be published in early 2023. It won’t have a formal launch, but we’ll let everyone know when it’s published.
At the moment, the standards and framework haven’t been accredited or quality assured.
The Safeguarding Standards Review Group will look into this.
We don’t have any agreed timescales yet. Agreed timescales will be in the framework and available in early 2023.
Organisations can still use their existing terms, but they must show how their training, learning and development match those set out in the standards. The standards build on and strengthen existing groups and levels.
Each Regional Safeguarding Board will be responsible for identifying appropriate, confident, qualified and experienced trainers to provide the learning programmes.
The Regional Safeguarding Boards may choose to use the standards to help them find the best trainers to run safeguarding programmes to make sure practitioners are safe and effective in their role.
The framework will have clear guidance for minimum training time, and it has been created with sector colleagues to reflect pressures of staff release. It is hoped that it is achievable for all organisations.
The framework and feedback will be reviewed by the Standards Review Group throughout 2023.